iKons 0.6 for KDE2/3
Individual Icons
Description:

iKons is a hi-color icon theme for both KDE2 and KDE3.
It contains 16x16 icons, 22x22 icons, 32x32 icons, 48x48 icons and 64x64 icons for KDE, a KDE icon theme that can be used with the Control Center, as well as a README file that tells you how to install and alter this icon theme. This release also features some icons in development.

Last changelog:

15 years ago

iKons 0.5.7:
* new 32x32 icon for Kcontrol
* new 32x32 and 48x48 icons for Kdesktop
* new 16x16 and 22x22 icons for 'stop'

iKons 0.5.8
* new 32x32 and 48x48 'open folder' icons in different colors

iKons 0.5.9
* improved 32x32 hardware icons
* new scanner and zipdrive icons
* improved 22x22 folder_open en folder_new icon
* various consistency improvements

iKons 0.6 RC1
* more 3D folder icons
* some new 16x16 icons
* various improvements

iKons 0.6
* added 16x16 grey folder icon
* new 48x48 Kcontrol icon
* various improvements

Note: iKons 0.6 is going to be included in KDE 3.0. The deadline for artwork is 2.3.2002 (Saturday) at 13:00 UT ... so if you have any wishes left for iKons 0.6: this is your last chance to get them in iKons 0.6 for KDE 3.

tsujan

2 years ago

My distro is Debian and I rcommend OpenSUSE to newcomers. The only thing I have against Ubuntu is that even some of their basic packages, like gtk, are hacked for use in Ubuntu. A KDE, Qt or GTK theme that works in all distros may show false problems in Ubuntu because of that. IMO Ubuntu doesn't provide a standard Linux experience.

Report

librehat

3 years ago

gladly there's a group here!

I'm using Fedora.

Report

yokmp

5 years ago

I use Sabayon Linux and Mageia. Most things i want is in a repo or you can get the sourcecode.
Maybe they should do it like Archlinux with AUR/yaourt did.
So they can upload their source here and simultaneously add their stuff in the *buntu user repo. Problem solved? o.0

Report

yokmp

5 years ago

I use Sabayon Linux and Mageia. Most things i want is in a repo or you can get the sourcecode.
Maybe they should do it like Archlinux with AUR/yaourt did.
So they can upload their source here and simultaneously add their stuff in the *buntu user repo. Problem solved? o.0

Report

yokmp

5 years ago

ignore this ... some kind of bug in the comment-thingy? -.-

Report

LegendaryBibo

5 years ago

For the same reason people target Windows when making software. Ubuntu has the biggest target base out of all the distros.

Are you referring to content here on gnome look as well?

I package everything and write instructions on installation specifically for Ubuntu because it's just what I use, as does the majority of the users who come one here. The people who produce content on here want the most downloads as possible so there's no way in hell we're going to write out instructions for Arch or Fedora only and leave the Ubuntu users hanging.

Report

ozky

5 years ago

i use that first add comment link
my system it is mageia 1 kde 4.6.5 and i think this is best kde distro of 2011-2012

Report

ozky

5 years ago

i try to write new comment to this group but it was add it to this http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=602#c425173 and i have no idea why ???

Report

ozky

5 years ago

Mageia 1 kde 4.6.5

Report

LizzardDude

5 years ago

Using Linux since 15 Years, now and having seen most of the highs and lows - including retarded stuff like United Linux.

And every time when a so-called "Pro" comes near me, he tries to convince me that *buntu is the coolest, easiest and most advanced Distro in the whole Universe. And, of course, SuSE sucks because of YaST, RedHat sucks because of their epic failures in the past, gentoo sucks because it's too complicated and so on...

Guys, get real! *buntu never was and never will be the solution to "the Problem".

Report

LizzardDude

5 years ago

Oh, and I'm on openSuSE at home and SLE, RedHat, Debian and Gentoo in my Job.

Clearly *buntu free zone. And not only because they're breaking stuff.

Report

jhsbg

5 years ago

It keeps falling here for whatever freaking reason.
I give up, please delete all my posts from this board.

jhs out.

Report

LegendaryBibo

5 years ago

Look at the id numbers of the group and this page.

Both are 602. Me thinks it's a conflict of id numbers.

Report

jhsbg

5 years ago

Quote:

Hello everyone

Who is sick of all these Ubuntu-only stuff in the linux world?

Join this group and let us show the artists that there is more then Ubuntu. Many of these people doing a great work. If they want to give special support to Ubuntu so is it ok, but they should upload an archive like .tar.gz for people who are using one of the many other distributions or one of the BSD's.


1. It's thAn, not thEn
2. This whining post does not make any sense
2.1. Who says Ubuntu developers have to compile packages for say BSD or any other else?
2.2. If you are BSD fan, there's nothing wrong with it (I like BSD very much, not for my desktop or laptop, though), please go whine on their developer's team.
2.3. If you really really like and want so badly some piece of OSS, you are free to compile it yourself for _any_ platform it is designed for and suits your needs.
2.4. If certain OSS is not available precompiled for your system of choice, definitely does not mean that you have to bark against Ubuntu dev's for that. They are doing _their_ job very well and what you want is so not their job's object!
2.4.1. Do I need to mention the difference between GPL and BSD License?
So, what are you? Just another heater? We wanted more than Windows - we got it. We wanted more just some plain Linux distribution - here you go. There is Ubuntu and most certainly there are many many others which shine with their own glow. It is you call. So put yourself together and do what you've got to do. Just remember with that whining you are not even getting closer!

Report

jhsbg

5 years ago

Some Moderator, please remove my comment above.
It was intended to go somewhere else, something must have gone wrong :(
My apologies for the unintended spam.
Thank you.

Report

jhsbg

5 years ago

Quote:
Hello everyone

Who is sick of all these Ubuntu-only stuff in the linux world?

Join this group and let us show the artists that there is more then Ubuntu. Many of these people doing a great work. If they want to give special support to Ubuntu so is it ok, but they should upload an archive like .tar.gz for people who are using one of the many other distributions or one of the BSD's.

If you join this group please tell us your distribution.


1. It's thAn, not thEn
2. This whining post does not make any sense
2.1. Who says Ubuntu developers have to compile packages for say BSD or any other else?
2.2. If you are BSD fan, there's nothing wrong with it (I like BSD very much, not for my desktop or laptop, though), please go whine on their developer's team.
2.3. If you really really like and want so badly some piece of OSS, you are free to compile it yourself for _any_ platform it is designed for and suits your needs.
2.4. If certain OSS is not available precompiled for your system of choice, definitely does not mean that you have to bark against Ubuntu dev's for that. They are doing _their_ job very well and what you want is so not their job object!
2.4.1. Do I need to mention the difference between GPL and BSD License?
So, what are you? Just another heater? We wanted more than Windows - we got it. We wanted more just some plain Linux distribution - here you go. There is Ubuntu and most certainly there are many many others which shine with their own glow. It is you call. So put yourself together and do what you've got to do. Just remember with that whining you are not even getting closer!

Report

HardinComp

5 years ago

I'm running LMDE with KDE bolted on top (until LMDE/KDE comes out, of course).

Report

Thempleton

5 years ago

This a Top-five playing song. We actually have around 400 different nouances of Linux-Kernel-Based-Operating-Systems. Most of them have one or more Window Managers and at least one packaging system tailored for their specific monolithic filesystem setups.
At the opposite side, Windows is one operating system, limityed to one window manager and one filesystem (organized with as near as no restricted order).

You positively have to consider every "distro" as a particular operating system with its rules.
There are two ways to get an application to run on a particular distro:
a) installing it from the distro's repository with the appropriate package manager; if the application is missing you have to ask the community or the developer to package it or you can do it by yourself;

b) getting the sources from the developer and compiling them by yourself as the developer instructs; take in mind that the developer can't have the necessary know-how for compiling his application on every operating system!

The reason most applications are Ubuntu ready is very simple, Ubuntu is the most spread Linux Kernel Based Operating System! and its community is very large so most developers will service their applications for this O.S..

Installing a rarely used and supported distro and requiring to have a significantly filled repository is like going into a mexican restaurant and asking for russian caviar... http://qt-apps.org/comments/img/fi10.gif

Apart from this I sustain that developers should develop their applications without writing code working with one window manager only or with a particular filesystem organisation in mind.
Applications, where applicable, should be installed and work in/from userspace only.

Report

sharkhan

5 years ago

Fedora 16 x86. And OS MCBC 3.0

Report

marcaemus

5 years ago

Was just gonna try Decibel2 audio player but its only available as a deb. Not installing dkpg just to try this thing out.

Report

Padster

5 years ago

You could extract the deb and just manually install the files.

Report

anoknusa

5 years ago

Sure, this person could install all the files by hand, OR the developer could provide a source tarball so savvy users can use their package managers to build distro-compliant packages themselves and then share them with others. Which of those sounds more reasonable?

dpkg and pacman are both examples of package managers that come with tools to build packages that can then be installed via apt or pacman, while Arch, Slackware and Gentoo are examples of distros that provide a framework whereby users can create custom scripts to build custom packages that can be handled by their respective package managers. Many people make use of these tools. I understand that Ubuntu users typically want to be coddled, and that many devs are willing to comply. That's fine; do your thing. But that's no excuse to treat each and every Linux user like a helpless child, nor act as though you don't care about open-source software (no source code can be "open" without first being made available).

Report

Padster

5 years ago

I know it would be better to have the source tarball, but I was just saying you don't have to install dpkg.

Report

biztux

5 years ago

Why don't you just download and install alien for you distro, then you can convert .deb packages to .rpm or .tgz etc...

"Life is simple with linux - don't complicate it!"

Report

anoknusa

5 years ago

Dirty hacks are not solutions. Besides, expecting people to convert a binary rather than simply providing them with the source code isn't as half-assed as it gets, given that it requires no work at all.

Report

15 years ago

iKons 0.5.7:
* new 32x32 icon for Kcontrol
* new 32x32 and 48x48 icons for Kdesktop
* new 16x16 and 22x22 icons for 'stop'

iKons 0.5.8
* new 32x32 and 48x48 'open folder' icons in different colors

iKons 0.5.9
* improved 32x32 hardware icons
* new scanner and zipdrive icons
* improved 22x22 folder_open en folder_new icon
* various consistency improvements

iKons 0.6 RC1
* more 3D folder icons
* some new 16x16 icons
* various improvements

iKons 0.6
* added 16x16 grey folder icon
* new 48x48 Kcontrol icon
* various improvements

Note: iKons 0.6 is going to be included in KDE 3.0. The deadline for artwork is 2.3.2002 (Saturday) at 13:00 UT ... so if you have any wishes left for iKons 0.6: this is your last chance to get them in iKons 0.6 for KDE 3.

Filename Version Description Filetype Packagetype License Downloads Date Filesize Install
Score 74%
74.00 Likes
26 Dislikes
Details
version
0.6
updated Mar 02 2002
added Dec 14 2001
downloads
page views 1946
support kborrey
For The Product
iKons 0.6 for KDE2/3
5 - 10 - 25 - 50 - 100 - 200 - 500